SummaryArthur Brennan (Matthew McConaughey), an American professor, travels to Japan in the midst of a personal crisis. As he wanders through a mysterious forest with a dark past, he experiences flashbacks of his fraught but loving relationship with his wife, Joan (Naomi Watts), and meets an enigmatic stranger, Takumi (Ken Watanabe), who is lo...
SummaryArthur Brennan (Matthew McConaughey), an American professor, travels to Japan in the midst of a personal crisis. As he wanders through a mysterious forest with a dark past, he experiences flashbacks of his fraught but loving relationship with his wife, Joan (Naomi Watts), and meets an enigmatic stranger, Takumi (Ken Watanabe), who is lo...
The Sea of Trees proves a stronger movie experience than one might expect. It’s anchored by a fine, understated performance by Matthew McConaughey and a deeply felt, if at times melodramatic, story that proves strangely immersive.
As all the dots join in a pattern that strives for deeper meaning, the just too-damned-cute Sea of Trees becomes undone by a surfeit of contrived ingenuity.
What's in a movie ? - That it makes you think and feel in meaningful ways. Well, this one did, for me. I think it is an important movie, with distinct character. For me, it was immersive. I dont know much about "Film Theory", and I think much of the down-nose critique reflects the writers' own phobias.
The elitism spewing out of the American paid reviewer community is mind boggling. Do everyone a favour and go cure cancer, then at least your efforts would have substance. I saw this from a completely different angle than the reviewers - in which I found the plot and direction to be solid, but casting to be really off. If some solid indie actors that were not tainted by trying so hard to please the oscars panel were put in the leading roles - it could have been understated, eerie and profound. I dont give a damn about some over thought and over done performance - subtlety, true subtlety, was missing from the American cast. Maybe my view on this film being an eight is only due to the shyte show the professional reviewers created but I enjoyed the plot, enjoyed the message and appreciated the non linear angle. Just the acting really let this down for me - a perfect example of trying too hard to be subtle to appease the ridiculously shallow and overhyped hollywood "overlords" hell bent on inducing extremes.
The Sea of Trees is a movie about guilt and grief that elicits just that in its viewers: guilt and grief. Because for every ephemeral moment to admire in Gus Van Sant‘s latest film, there are about a half-dozen more that make you wonder what went wrong.
On paper, it feels like a can’t-miss, especially when one considers how much it plays with themes that Van Sant has often - brilliantly explored before. Movies don’t exist on paper. And this one’s a mess.
As it turns out, there is something worse than Nicholas Sparks, the king of morbid romantic kitsch, and that’s a Nicholas Sparks pretender with highfalutin pretensions.
This risibly long-winded drama is perhaps above all a profound cultural insult, milking the lush green scenery of Japan’s famous Aokigahara forest for all it’s worth, while giving co-lead Ken Watanabe little to do other than moan in agony, mutter cryptically, and generally try to act as though McConaughey’s every word isn’t boring him (pardon the expression) to death.
From the cloying, ever-present score to the complete lack of narrative momentum, it all adds up to a film that's easily Van Sant's worst, and is a sad black mark on McConaughey's mostly excellent recent run. Ultimately, Sea Of Trees feels like an entirely appropriate title: it makes you feel like you're drowning, and it's full of sap.
In an attempt to end life, discovering the life itself!
Actually, this was a better film than what I have heard of it. It is like another version of 'The Constant Gardener'. About a man who never understood his wife, feels guilty while finding some answers after her depart. During his attempt to kill himself in the famous Aokigahara forest, also known as suicide forest, he meets a Japanese man who got lost and befriends. While trying to help him find his way out, they face some unexpected obstacles. Beside, the flashback stories were narrated alongside, piece by piece to reveal earlier account.
From the director of 'Good Will Hunting', the film is about the survival and fighting the loss and depression. Too slow, so patience is the key to watch it. A bit long narrative, but in the end it is worth. The developments were not that interesting, though the final twist which is kind of simple and predictable makes us a little happier. Great cast, particularly McConaughey, though Naomi and Watanabe in the fine supportive roles.
For me this is a good film. I think some people, as well as the film critics got all wrong. I'm not saying it is a must see, but it is a different and a decent film even for the average people. The problem with this is the weak screenplay. Familiarity is the right word here, because you could foresee the direction of the progression before every scene. Still, the performances, beautiful locations, all make it an alright film. Normal people should think twice before try it, but the film fanatics should not hesitate to go for it. That means this film is for the selected viewers.
7/10
I really don't understand the extreme harsh reviews. The film is too long for the story and starts a bit slow as well as there being some unlikely or highly coincidental moments but there is so much emotion in the characters of this film and Mcconaughey especially relays this beautifully. Many tearful moments and a very satisfying ending. Impressive cinematography although a somewhat predictable score. The relationship between Watts and Mcconaughey is full of real emotion, grounded in reality.
Definitely worth the watch overall, however there are flaws to look past.
I have seen far worse films than The Sea of Trees. Honestly, its harsh reaction at Cannes in 2015 feels as though it was quite unfair. Make no mistake, the film is not great. However, there are great elements within its mess of a story and the film is hardly worth laughing at. That said, the Cannes audience can be quite harsh and the film's sentimentality is certainly for everyone. While predictable, The Sea of Trees can be a moving tearjerker at times, but only when it really wants to be. Otherwise, it is a film that can seriously drag at times with incredible tonal shifts.
Jumping from suicide introspective to survival film to relationship drama to a heart warming and sentimental conclusion, The Sea of Trees struggles most often when in the forest. Traveling to the "Suicide Forest" in Japan, Arthur Brennan (Matthew McConaughey) is a heartbroken and depressed man who meets another man, Takumi Nakamura (Ken Watanabe) just as he is set to kill himself. What follows is the duo trying to get out of the forest with flashbacks to Arthur's life with his wife, Joan (Naomi Watts). It is in these flashbacks that the film truly delivers on its promise of being a thoroughly emotional film.
With a great relationship created between Arthur and Joan, director Gus Van Sant knows how to pull on the audience's heart strings. Though his approach is often obvious and predictable (the ambulance sequence), the film could work as a sentimental look at love and loss. However, Van Sant becomes obsessed with the forest. Though the forest is always lovingly shot by cinematographer Kasper Tuxen, there is not much of a story here. The survival element is silly and merely distracts from what the rest of the film is trying to accomplish. McConaughey and Watanabe just limp around the forest moaning in pain with very little to do and, as such, the film suffers greatly.
That said, one of the best moments does come in the forest when Arthur talks about his relationship with Joan, both the highs, the lows, and why he is in the forest. Here, the film finds it emotional power with McConaughey's great delivery of this monologue. From there on out, the film really turns into the emotional drama it should have been, though the punches it does throw are quite obvious. If you watch the film, you should have an idea by the 100th time Watanabe's character mentions the spirits in the forest. It is as if the film does not trust its audience to get it, so it starts laying the bread crumbs (heh) along the way to help lead you home.
This is why it is so unfortunate that the film itself gets lost in the forest. The forest, while interesting for a suicide drama, is not the focus in any world. The real dramatic juice comes from Arthur and Joan's relationship and that should have been the focus with flash forwards to Arthur in the forest with Takumi. Or, at the very least, not have them be lost in the forest, getting hurt, and struggling to get out. If Van Sant insisted on going in that direction, then it needed to be a straight forward survival drama where these two men learn they do want to live with no flashbacks. In other words, there were far better options than what we got, which is far too little of the flashbacks and far too much of the forest.
Now, what makes the flashbacks so great? Well, the film really instills them with an odd sort of warmth. Though what it shows can be quite the opposite, the flashbacks have a feeling that is unique within the film and capture the sentimentality the film wishes to imbue upon the audience. Essentially, it is this sentimentality for those near you whom you love and care about, even if things are not always great. The Sea of Trees captures this perfectly and is why these sequences work so well for the film.
Unfortunately, these scenes not plentiful enough. Instead, we get a film that jumps all over the place getting to its ending, drags heavily in the middle, and takes too long to get to the point. It is an unfortunate that this one wasted Watanabe entirely in a meaningless role and wasted good performances from McConaughey and Watts. As it stands, The Sea of Trees is not boo or laugh worthy, it is solely disappointment worthy given its promising cast, director, and positive elements.
The Sea of Trees is disappointing with high expectations. An excellent cast and an interesting plot concept that raises the topic of suicide and loneliness. For the most part, The Sea of Trees is a drama in which most of the plot is served as flashbacks. But the plot does not reveal the characters at all, with excellent acting for both Matthew McConaughey and Naomi Watts, it looks terrible. The Sea of Trees is a gloriously boring and uninteresting film that does not explain its motives to the viewer in any way. The Sea of Trees is disappointing given the potential lost. Better instead of The Sea of Trees to watch the Death Triology from Alejandro Inarritu, get a lot more fun.
An awful film that hammers its own extremely talented cast and shoves them into a lousy drag for two hours. The Sea Of Trees is a horribly long, weakly executed and poorly made film. It makes you wonder what Van Sant slipped into Kidman and McConnaghuy's drinks and made them sign up for this trash.