User Score
Universal acclaim- based on 2281 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 2,078 out of 2281
-
Mixed: 71 out of 2281
-
Negative: 132 out of 2281
Review this album
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
RadioheadfanDec 4, 2007Limps along until you realize its not worth helping this lame dog. A real snoozer.
-
-
ChrisB.Nov 11, 2007Every Radiohead album since OK Computer has been vastly overrated, overhyped, and over dissected by music critics, this one isnt any different. This time though, half the songs dont seem to lead to anywhere except some sort of hungover dream state.
-
-
baffleds.Oct 18, 2007
-
-
ParksB.Dec 10, 2007
-
-
DaveCJul 16, 2009
-
-
markn.Nov 1, 2007
-
-
JonathanFOct 30, 2007wow, definitley the most overrated band of life.
-
-
GonzOJan 16, 2008
-
-
ZachJ.Nov 9, 2007maybe rolling stone has never heard "roygbiv" from the boards of canada's 1998 release "Music has the right to children" before they heard the song "all i need". i guess 9 years is long enough that when radiohead uses the same beat it doesn't sound like any other band on earth. boards of canada = other worldly
-
-
JonG.Jan 31, 2008Compare this to Kid A is a crime, this is a boring repetitive album. I'm not a RH fan but this is a bad joke. Anybody here listen to Ok Computer?... Lets face it, Radiohead have too many fans, they don't do the effort anymore. This album is about fans, money and fame, not about music. I give 5 points for the great marketing campaign.
-
-
RobertVApr 21, 2008You know Smooth Jazz? This is Smooth Electrorock.
-
-
IbanLDec 16, 2007Kinda like okay, I guess. Despite the major marketing breakthrough the album itself lacks innovation and renovation. After Amnesiac (my personal favorite album of them) and HTTT this is pretty poor for me. It's like a fourth transitional album: And it does get boring.
-
-
Apr 13, 2011
-
IsaacAsheNov 3, 2007Ultimately fails to grab you by the scruff all the way through - a disappointment after all the plaudits I read before listening, and the genius solo work of Thom Yorke that proceeded this release.
-
-
TomB.Oct 15, 2007The softness seems limp and WILL NOT let up. Can it touch Ok Computer? Get the fuck out of here, critics.
-
-
JeffWOct 16, 2007Anyone else bothered by the complete lack of coherence in the lyrics? You could take every line in the entire album, randomly arrange them, and each song would have just as much meaning or emotional punch as it does now (none). While these songs have a beauty to them musically, they have a complete emptiness to them because there is nothing to really sink your teeth in.
-
-
AlexS.Oct 25, 2007
-
-
JorisOct 20, 2007
-
-
CourtneyBOct 4, 2008I don't understand the proclamations that this is the best record since OKC. It's pretty good but unlike OKC or the albums released since, it is not surprising or deep... to me, it's mostly good but mostly boring and shallow.
-
-
JTMooJun 10, 2010Ok Computer, Kid A, and Amnesiac are possibly the best three sequential albums I have ever listened to. In Rainbows, pretty but a bit boring. Bumped it up a notch for innovative marketing.
-
-
MesiaSOct 14, 2007Hmm, reviews seem to be mixed on this one. I think there are a few good "songs" but their extremely weak lyrical abilities are put on display here on the more sparse songs.
-
-
smOct 14, 2007it's okay.
-
-
allenOct 16, 2007I'm really suprised at all the gushing for this album! I'm a huge Radiohead fan, and I do think this is a good ablum. However, I'm slighlty perplexed by the "best album ever made" and "best radiohead album ever". Seriously? Please! Again, this is a good record, but better than OK Computer and/or Kid A? Not a chance.
-
-
PaulD.Oct 16, 2007I know Radiohead will always be critical darlings (see above) but, even as a diehard fan, I can only describe this album as a directionless drone. I never thought an album would make me yearn for the pop sensibilities of Amnesiac. Glad I only payed a fiver.
-
-
pierreb.Oct 16, 2007not bad
-
-
ABOct 21, 2007
-
-
edenc.Oct 20, 2007Mediocre album... none of the songs really caught my attention. 15 step, weird fishes, and all i need were good but still not great... I don't get how critics simply rate an album high because it is unique not because it is good music.
-
-
ReubenFOct 23, 2007Sadly, it is commonplace for bands to lose it over time. Most are one-hit wonders. Some manage a few good albums. A select few sustain a career among the best for longer than a decade. Radiohead are among the select few. However, on this album, they prove themselves no exception to the general rule. They have past their used by date. The end.
-
-
AllanC.Oct 23, 2007
-
-
DavidH.Oct 24, 2007
-
Awards & Rankings
-
In Rainbows really does present Radiohead at their most full-blooded and confident.
-
Overall, the material feels more human, more honest, more assured.
-
Happily, In Rainbows is pretty, pretty good.