SummaryRelying on expert testimony and existing footage, Active Measures documents the surprisingly interconnected rise of two men, Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. This film examines the evolution of Soviet influence techniques into modern warfare tactics that manipulated elections in several democratic nations, culminating in the 2016 U.S. Pr...
SummaryRelying on expert testimony and existing footage, Active Measures documents the surprisingly interconnected rise of two men, Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. This film examines the evolution of Soviet influence techniques into modern warfare tactics that manipulated elections in several democratic nations, culminating in the 2016 U.S. Pr...
If there’s anything that Active Measures does most effectively, it’s to demonstrate the depths and the breadth of the corruption, the criminality, the immorality operating in contemporary politics.
Jack Bryan’s thorough, chilling rabbit-hole inquiry into our president’s connections to Russia — Active Measures — is as good a place as any to fuel one’s fear/outrage.
This formidable film is sometimes zealous to a fault: The credits cite more than 200 sources of archival material, from The Washington Post to YouTube channels. It’s a lot to take in, as names and numbers zip by, yet missing some of its points may be healthy. To explore every moment is to risk overdosing on outrage.
While it’s not as if the film comes up with some smoking gun that Robert Mueller hasn’t yet, it fills in the Trump-Russia connection in a dogged, rigorously reported, eyebrow-raising way.
Unfortunately, Bryan's case quickly turns into a dense, confusing slog through a bewildering array of newspaper headlines, TV news clips, splashy graphics and talking heads.
Active Measures is an assault on the eyes, the ears, the mind. By coming on so strong, so fevered, Bryan achieves the dubious feat of making his host of documented facts, reasonable inferences, and alarming subjects for further research all seem seem less persuasive than if they had been presented more soberly.
I loved the way this documentary put it all together in one package for me although the delivery was dizzying and sometimes hard to follow. It gives a strong argument for Russian collusion that is unabashedly(and succeeding)dividing the American people. This is the cancer that must be cut out.
I wouldn't say it falls flat. The content is good, the message is important, though it does seem to be preaching to the choir. Stylistically, just a mess, in my opinion. A lot of talking heads with no time to breathe. Mediocre quality of many clips. Not sure who thought dance music would add much to the discourse. It seems oddly placed and sometimes drags on.
If you believed Saddam Hussein had chemical weapons, this movie is for you. If you're an ideologue on an anti-Russian bender, you'll find this movie intoxicatingly pleasant. But if you want a real dose of reality about the troubling Trump-Russia scandal "Active Measures" has nothing for you except an object lesson in how mass deception is done.
"The President is a puppet of Vladimir Putin!" That sums up the revelations of Jack Bryan’s blockbuster documentary "Active Measures." Putin’s alleged efforts to manipulate the 2016 Presidential election in collaboration with The Trump Campaign are the "active measures" that title the film.
Interviewees form a star-studded cast, including former presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and the late John McCain, former US envoy to Moscow Michael McFaul, the former presidents of Georgia and Estonia, among others. There's no host asking questions -- just the commentaries and quips from the interviewees alone.
Active Measures is a term coined during the Cold War era to describe a variety of deceptive Soviet political warfare activities that can loosely be described as propaganda. Active measures are frequently used in the media to promote political positions. From a media analysis standpoint, one fact stands out clearly. This is a movie that seems intent on convincing audiences of its premise. But it doesn't offer much relevant proof.
For instance, Clinton says of Putin, "He wants to be the richest man in the world." How in the world does she know that? Then there is McCain's comparison of Putin with the rise of ****. McCain just joined Clinton with more hyperbolic disparagement. Other characters in the movie touch on issues that have been blamed on Putin. For example, Jonathan Winer, a former State Department Official, said the 2006 polonium poisoning death of Alexander Litvinenko was a "murder that was very directly linked to Russia." Another former State Department official Daniel Fried claimed that "Putin started forcing the independent media to knuckle under, putting in state control, turning them into propaganda outfits." Fried goes on to claim that Putin started "going after independent journalists,… They ended up dead." These are all allusions to mainstream myths about Putin.
Some of their assertions seem to belie a level of confusion. Former ambassador Michael McFaul, speaking about the alleged 2016 election hacking said, "They stole the data. Let's be clear about it... This is theft. If the Russians walked into my house and took something out, this is exactly the same thing." This is not the same thing.
A more consequential matter is that of Putin's KGB background. "His role in the KGB was to support Russian intelligence officers living under assumed identities under deep cover inside the United States and developing active measures to impact the policies of the United States." That is a quote from Jeremy Bash, identified as CIA chief of staff 2009-2011. However, it appears that Putin's actual role in the KGB was extremely insignificant, virtually that of a clerk assigned to a backwater posting in Dresden, East Germany. Active Measures presents yet more specious, factually unsupported stories to advance the movie's primary premise. For example, there is the matter of the 2016 Republican platform with regard to Ukraine. There's also the mysterious death in Washington DC of the head of Russia's English language broadcasting arm. These and other vignettes appear to follow a similar pattern of deception.
Some of the speakers appear to have excellent credentials, but closer scrutiny suggests that they may be speaking outside of their areas of expertise. For example, Winer was State’s special envoy to Libya. Then he became associated with the Steele dossier, a document which has largely been discredited and tied to the presidential campaign of Hilary Clinton. But the ultimate impact of the material about Russia is to mislead the audience to a conclusion that is at odds with the truth. The film sets out to warn the audience about active measures being used to deceive Americans. Ironically, the film is itself an example of active measures.
Cast members state unfounded premises about Russia as if they are facts. Then they draw conclusions based on those premises. The fast pace of the film does not allow the audience to weigh the information before the next speaker is up. The pacing makes the film feel like a two-hour long trailer. Audience members unable to tag the premises as false will likely be drawn into accepting the conclusions without realizing they've been hoodwinked. That's the danger presented by Active Measures.
F*** your "experts".. why should I believe them? because they have been indoctrinated and given a special PHD or Masters degree paper telling them they can form so called facts? I think for myself through my own research. Don't need your garbage anti-Russian views. Last I checked Russia is a majority rural, Christian nation much like our own US history with a leader who is patriotic to Russian heritage and values. Isn't the pro liberal, communist way about building so called bridges? like they so desperately want with Islamic countries but support the state of Israel committing human rights violations every day against the Palestinians? Kiss my a$$